Lindsay Clancy: The Warning at the Center of WHAT Suit?!
Patrick Clancy is suing the people who treated his former wife, Lindsay Clancy, before the deaths of their children. Lindsay is suing some of those providers too. The two civil cases are different, but they run into the same uncomfortable question: what did medical professionals know, and what were they legally required to do with it?
At a hearing over whether Patrick’s wrongful-death claim should be dismissed, attorney Howard Cooper said he believes Lindsay will testify that she told her providers she was having homicidal thoughts involving the children. Kevin Reddington, representing Lindsay in her criminal case, promptly challenged that account. He said she never made such a disclosure and had not agreed to testify. The court heard an attorney’s representation, not Lindsay’s testimony. That difference matters.
Patrick’s complaint accuses psychiatrist Jennifer Tufts, nurse practitioner Rebecca Jollotta, and their employers of negligent treatment and inadequate monitoring. Their attorneys deny wrongdoing and argue that Massachusetts law restricts liability for failing to protect third parties when a patient has not made a qualifying threat. Patrick’s side disputes the application of that defense to allegations about treatment itself. The judge has not yet ruled on the dismissal motion.
Lindsay’s own malpractice complaint reaches additional clinicians and facilities. Both actions address the care she received; neither substitutes for a verdict in her criminal case. Her first criminal trial ended with a hung jury and mistrial.
Tony Brueski and retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke trace the competing accounts without pretending a courtroom statement is settled evidence. Patrick testified about his concerns at home. Providers testified that Lindsay denied thoughts of harming others. Now the lawyers disagree about what Lindsay herself would say under oath.
That is the point of this combined conversation: a legal fight about knowledge, warnings, foreseeability, and professional responsibility. Before anybody decides who should have recognized the danger, the court has to determine what claims can even be heard.
Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #RobinDreeke #KevinReddington #HowardCooper #WrongfulDeath #MedicalMalpractice #Duxbury #TrueCrime
