Lindsay Clancy’s Prosecutors Built Their Whole Case on THIS
The prosecution at Plymouth Superior Court spent its first week doing something specific. Not just presenting evidence — building a sequence. The 911 call first. Then the pajamas. Then the exercise bands. Then the fourteen-second phone call. By the time any psychiatric expert takes the stand, the prosecution is betting the jury has already decided.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries joins Tony Brueski to examine the prosecution’s approach — from the “best day” testimony to the argument that Lindsay was doctor shopping, to ADA Buckingham’s opening statement that people with mental illness commit crimes every day and are held responsible.They cover whether the prosecution’s evidence sequence is designed to prove intent or overwhelm a defense before it begins, what happens when jurors absorb emotional testimony before hearing clinical explanations, and what Massachusetts law actually requires for criminal responsibility.Tony Brueski and criminal defense attorney Bob Motta of Defense Diaries.
END LINKS
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
DISCLAIMER
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
HASHTAGS
#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #PostpartumPsychosis #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #CriminalResponsibility #TrueCrime #MurderTrial
