Lindsay Clancy’s Judge Ruled One Stubborn Juror Is THIS
Lindsay Clancy’s double jeopardy motion was denied on November 9, 2026, clearing prosecutors to try her again for the deaths of her three children. The defense argued that because the foreperson twice told Judge William Sullivan that one juror wasn’t following the law on reasonable doubt, Sullivan should have replaced that juror with an alternate instead of declaring a mistrial. Sullivan answered that a Massachusetts judge can’t remove a juror over how he votes, and that pressing the holdout further would have coerced him. Then he wrote the sentence that keeps this case alive. He also ruled the holdout’s phone records and jury questionnaire stay out of the defense’s hands, and he refused to gag Kevin Reddington. Prosecutors have said they’ll retry Clancy but haven’t said whether it’s first-degree murder, which carries life without parole. I lay out every path from here, including the one that lets Sullivan decide the case alone.
Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#LindsayClancy #JudgeSullivan #HiddenKillers #ClancyRetrial #DoubleJeopardy #KevinReddington #HoldoutJuror #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #Massachusetts
