Do Karen Read’s Reactions Mirror a Child in Crisis Or An Innocent Adult
Karen Read says she saw John O’Keefe go into the house. But her words, her tone, and her actions tell a different story. In today’s episode, Tony Brueski is joined by Robin Dreeke, former FBI Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program, to analyze the subtle and not-so-subtle ways Read’s story has shifted—and what it may mean in court.
We break down her possible consciousness of guilt, the psychological profile that appears to underlie her self-centered responses, and how her narrative control tactics may be backfiring. Dreeke explains why inconsistencies in her speech patterns, emotional regulation, and relationship dynamics reveal more than she intends.
This episode also digs into how alcohol may have lowered her behavioral filters, exposing her core self in public interviews and behind closed doors. Plus, we explore the latest revelations from forensic data—particularly the Lexus SUV’s digital footprint and how it could align with the moment O’Keefe was struck.
If you’ve been watching the Karen Read case unfold and wondering what her behavior really says about guilt, innocence, or something in between—this is the episode you need to hear.
#KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #ForensicEvidence #FBIBehavioralAnalysis #TrueCrime #NarrativeControl #KarenReadTrial #CourtroomPsychology #LexusData #GuiltOrInnocence
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?
Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
