Defense Attorney Bob Motta on Karen Read: A Case Built on Flawed Evidence

Published by Tony Brueski on

Defense Attorney Bob Motta on Karen Read: A Case Built on Flawed Evidence
Why did Karen Read’s defense drop the rage-filled voicemail theory? What did Brennan do differently this time—and could it mean the prosecution is aiming for something far less than second-degree murder? In this explosive breakdown, criminal defense attorney Bob Motta (host of the podcast Defense Diaries) joins Tony Brueski to dissect the trial’s opening moves. From radically different strategies to new forensic angles and mysterious eyewitnesses, Motta reveals how both sides are rewriting the case—and how the jury might be swayed not by emotion, but by science. This episode dives deep into the unsettling possibility that even Karen doesn’t remember what really happened that night. And if the defense leans into that blackout… could it actually work? Listen in for the legal nuance, conflicting narratives, and the growing tension that might force Karen Reed to take the stand.

#KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #DefenseDiaries #BobMotta #TrueCrimePodcast #KarenReadTrial #BostonCrime #HiddenKillers #CourtroomDrama #LegalBreakdown

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok
https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter
https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872